Tuesday, June 30, 2026

What Is Spiritual Warfare?

I sometimes read articles on the website, Where Peter Is. I find the contributions interesting whether I agree or not. Mike Lewis is the founding managing editor there and has much experience in writing about and working with Catholic leadership. Lewis recently wrote an article, “Deception Day” (found HERE), about the current attention of many people concerning aliens and whether they exist as real creatures from other planets or are disguised demons, evil spiritual entities. As I understand it, one of his concerns is that some Catholic exorcists have become rather famous, mostly through social media, and promote the “aliens are demons” theory. In turn, questions lead to whether we are engaged in increasing spiritual warfare at this juncture.

To be truthful, I know little about alleged alien sightings. What I anyway say about aliens relates to probabilities of the random beginning of life and evolution. Adherents of the Intelligent Design movement have pointed out some of the known or estimated physical properties of the entire universe to prove mathematically the basically impossible chance of life starting anywhere by random movements of atoms. These factors include the total number of particles in the whole universe, the age of it assuming a Big Bang beginning (billions of years), and the possible amount of atomic interactions within each second. These numbers apply over the whole universe, and to any life where building blocks of molecular complexity are similar to ours, presumably in civilizations smart enough for vast space travel. When equations are applied correctly, they show the incredible improbability that functional biological structures, like our DNA and proteins, would form by chance. (If you are interested in details, see my post, “Exponents,” HERE.) I have similar thoughts about probabilities in any parallel universes.


Many people are unaware of these physical facts. They think the chances are good for real, intelligent civilizations to exist on other planets, formed by chance as it is often presumed humans are. But for any life to have started or evolved from random movements in any part of the universe, the probabilities are infinitesimally small to the point of impossible, water present or not. In any case, the whole world or worlds are under the sovereignty of the one and only Lord.

 

Now, Catholic exorcists are involved in expelling demons from people who are possessed by them. The devil, Satan, is an angel who rebelled against God, and is the leader of demons. The Catholic Church acknowledges the need for exorcists and bishops are in charge of assigning them. They usually have special training, and work with physical and mental health professionals to determine the best approach toward the affected person, who often has debilitating symptoms. Mr. Lewis is concerned that some exorcists are more interested in having a fan base than helping individuals. Yet if people are truly worried about demonic attacks, it is not surprising they seek information from those who are supposedly in a position to know about them and what to do.


Jesus Christ expelled many demons from individuals in His time on Earth, and since they seemed rather prevalent then, it's not hard to imagine they are still around. Pope Francis warned to never dialogue with the devil or seek him out (article HERE). I don't want to dwell on this subject, although just in discussing it we can't avoid it totally. The Holy Father reminded us that Christ used God's word, found in the Bible, to rebuke Satan in the desert. These Scriptures are inspired by the Holy Spirit, one of the three Persons of God, the same Essence as that of Christ Himself. One Bible verse from the letters of the disciple Paul tells us, “All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, for training in righteousness,” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Bible passes on the Lord’s truth to humans. May we immerse ourselves in this wisdom.


I've heard snippets from various sources which allude to the expulsion of demons from individuals as spiritual warfare. Though this practice holds a real need, I think it is perhaps a “branch” of spiritual warfare, something like hand-to-hand combat. 


From an Earthly, natural perspective, warfare infers fighting enemies, whether of a whole country or group such as terrorists. The conflicts might be over territory or in defense of unfair aggression. Some people do not like for Christians to use war terminology at all and want only references to peace. But there are differences between being a citizen of a physical political group and a member of Christ's spiritual Kingdom. Though each realm affects individuals, we also need to consider them separately.

 

Without doubt, for Earthly countries, peace is the best way. The current Pope, Leo XIV, is constantly reminding world leaders to dialogue and work out problems. At stake are the physical lives of their citizens and whether they can thrive.


Going from the physical to the spiritual, in Christ's Kingdom of Heaven, peace exists for believers who have died. But at some supernatural level, "good vs. bad" fluctuates, and interacts with the natural. Though Christ defeated Satan when He sacrificed Himself by living a perfect life and dying in our place on the cross, the devil is still “allowed” some power to try to influence living human beings. He wants to obtain as many souls as he can, perhaps to share his misery. 


Many persons ask why the Lord permits evil in the world. I think most Christians accept He created human beings to have free will for right and wrong. We should be sorry for bad choices and recognize that we need help to be worthy to live in God’s presence.


For the spiritual world as much as the physical, we must define what is at stake. Christians hold that humans have souls, whose everlasting happiness depends on being with the Lord in the afterlife. To obtain this bliss, we are called to have faith that Jesus Christ came from Heaven to live on Earth and redeem us from our sins. Christians need to be baptized in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and help others find their way to the same. If persons die without faith in Jesus in this way, we believe he or she is doomed to eternal anguish. (As an aside, for those who never heard of Christ, it is for God to judge. Before Christ came, the Old Testament tells that the Lord required people to be just and merciful, but His followers often failed.)


There are evil ideas and notions which seemingly come from spiritual sources to humans, affecting the ultimate end of Non-Christian souls. The process is at least partly on the supernatural plane, which goes beyond full human understanding. But any forces that keep individuals from believing in Jesus Christ as their Savior, turning them away from the Truth of the Trinity, are enemies resisting God. They use lies as weapons, untruths which affect non-believers, such as doubt that the Lord loves them, or whether God even exists. These are lined against the armaments of Christians who believe in the Lord. The Bible describes the armor of God, such as the shield of faith to quench the flaming arrows of the evil one, the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit which is the Word of God (cf. Ephesians 6:10-17).


Christians are involved in spiritual warfare, but we do not succeed by driving non-believers away. We win by winning persons over. War takes courage, no matter the realm, and it's reasonable to be wary. “But the Lord is faithful; he will strengthen you and guard you from the evil one” (2 Thess. 3:3).


Saturday, June 13, 2026

Jesus Christ's Works Testify

 The Bible’s New Testament tells about Jesus Christ. The first four books, the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John), were written by witnesses of His ministry on Earth, or at least investigated shortly thereafter. From the beginning, Jesus preached about His Kingdom of Heaven, and He also performed countless miracles. He became famous in Israel where He lived and even beyond. Hoards of people came to Him so they could learn from Him and be healed (cf. Matthew 4:23-25). 

[Note: my Bible links go to the New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE), at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). They bring up the entire chapter of the reference, where the verses can be easily found. The exception is where, for some reason, the USCCB links don’t work, in which case I connect with BibleGateway, using the same version of the Bible.]


In one specific example, John Chapter 5 relates that Jesus Christ healed a man who had been unable to walk for 38 years. It is worthwhile to read the whole chapter. Some Jews, probably indicating leaders of the religious sects, saw the healing but criticized Christ for doing it on the Sabbath, since doing work on that day was against their religious laws. In response, Christ spoke about the prophet who came before Him, John the Baptist. John testified about the truth, meaning that of Christ being the Son of God. Then Jesus says, “But I have a greater testimony than John’s. The works that the Father gave me to accomplish, these works that I perform testify on my behalf that the Father has sent me” (John 5:36).


Backtracking in John 5 a bit, Christ had said, “My Father is at work until now, so I am at work” (John 5:17). The next verse relates, “For this reason, the Jews tried all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath but He called God His own Father, making Himself equal to God” (John 5:18). 


Christ’s use of the word “works” may go beyond “miracles,” perhaps also meant to include the suffering for which He was headed on behalf of humankind. But we can associate the healing miracles with His works since He used the word in this context. In these cases, affected people were cured instantly. They were not given pills or operated upon. 

 

So, some people saw physical wonders, yet squirmed out of directly considering the phenomena. They accused Jesus Christ of disobeying the religious laws, which they, in their own way, carried to the extreme.

 

Other people accepted the miracles for what they were. Certainly 2000 years ago, they did not understand medicine as we do today. But they knew that never otherwise would lepers spontaneously heal at a touch (Matthew 8:1-4), or crippled persons instantaneously walk with a few words (John 5:1-15). Never before had the blind been able to see with an application of mud (John 9), or the dead respond to commands to return to life (Mark 5:21-43; John 11:1-44).  


And the works went beyond healing humans. Storms ceased (Mark 4:35-41), food was replicated (Matthew 14:15-21), among many other things (John 21:25).

 

It is worth contemplating that in His particular time on Earth, Christ placed so much emphasis on these miracles, to the point of using them to prove He is God.

 

How did Christ mend the failed biological systems of human bodies so they could once again function? He had to have a fundamental understanding of what organs and circulatory systems are, down to the cells and their extremely intricate makeup. He obviously had to have the ability to re-build tissue which was damaged and destroyed by disease and aging, and do so immediately. How did he change the trajectory of the wind? He probably knew all about the Earth’s weather patterns and systems. But having information about these things and commanding them to change immediately are two different things.

 

God is way above our possible knowledge. Humanity has come a long way in understanding natural laws, but what the Bible describes about the miracles is at a supernatural level. To blame Christ for healing on the Sabbath is a poor excuse for denying the Divine.


Though the terms "supernatural," "mystical," and "spiritual," may all bring certain ideas to our minds, I admit I don't have the meanings completely in my grasp. The words represent realities beyond the natural plane and probably full human comprehension. But I'd like to forge ahead and hope the reader will think about what I am saying, using their own experience and understanding.

Atheists don't believe in God at all, and I don't think I'm exaggerating that many secular scientists hold that our intellects will use science to reveal all the physical properties of our universe. Some Christians seem to acknowledge God and yet not the supernatural in any sense that pertains to us. Many think our universe came about by purely natural causes, and they also refuse even the possibility that God may have created different living species directly.

 

Of course, Christians have become gun-shy about science relating to religion. Medicine changed when people realized that diseases are caused by natural agents instead of spirits or evil gods. We all know about the revolution of understanding of the universe since Copernicus and Galileo. St. Augustine warned in so many words that the Bible is not a science book (The Literal Meaning of Genesis). However, St. Thomas Aquinas recognized that experts can disagree and "facts" be replaced. We know this to be true from progress in the understanding of scientists, such as from Newtonian gravity to the relativity of Einstein, and from determinism to the discoveries of quantum physics. St. Thomas advised to rely on what is taught about God from revelation (cf. Summa Theologiae II-II, Q. 2, AA. 3,4).


When one speaks of balance, it is difficult to avoid the pull of the natural. Biology, physics, chemistry, are magnificent and continue to amaze. But a person needs to consider the supernatural, which goes beyond what many scientists have limited reality to be. To think everything is only natural is also an extreme. He or she does not have to believe in a young Earth to believe in Christ’s miracles. We must be careful against making false associations that bring “all or nothing” conclusions, but, at least for a time, consider separate fields of study separately and then, where appropriate, integrate them.


The denial of Christ performing supernatural works is one area where Christian theology has gone wrong in the last few centuries: the historical-critical method where miracles can be negated, primarily due to our progress in science and associated fields. Various theologians attributed the Biblical information to unreliable stories, contemporary misunderstandings, or downright fabrications. Alfred Loisy (1857-1940) is considered the father of the Catholic modern movement, but theologians from other denominations were already sharing these ideas before him.


To some degree there has been a backlash to the historical-critical method, with Pope Benedict XVI one of the most influential persons in re-establishing a balance of factual investigation and allowance for Divine reality. He addressed this need in several places, including the Foreword to his book, Jesus of Nazareth, Part II.


However, I think there is still a strong impression among many Christians that God made humans capable of knowing all physical properties and laws, and we must find the subsequent sequences of all causes that got us to our present state. Christ’s amazing miracles, for many, do not fit in the step-wise logic.


Where does anti-supernaturalism stop? Catholics should believe the hosts in Mass are changed to Christ’s body and blood, yet many do not. We are told in the Scriptures that the Holy Spirit is living within believers (1 Corinthians 6:19 is one example). The late Pope Francis, who initiated the Synods on Synodality, asked us to pray that the Holy Spirit guide us in these proceedings. Once again, we are talking about a supernatural level.


God uses His judgment to do what is best. It is not for us to tell Him what that is, but to accept and appreciate what He has done and ask Him to continue to work in our lives. There's nothing in that to stop us from learning all we can about His Divine actions and the physical laws around us. Let us seek discernment to get a better idea of each realm.


Saturday, June 6, 2026

About Science Links

 As biological science advances at breath-taking rates, the websites for institutions such as research universities also change. I’ve been pleased that at least some of my links, such as to protein information at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) still exist after several years. But some sites have been removed, changed address, or are deemed insecure. In whatever writing I may continue to do, at this point I’m also planning to move on, with different theological interests, or at least different aspects of past interests. With time limits for writing and other pursuits, I don't intend to go through my whole blog to update all links.

This post has a few important biology sites. The link to this post will be put on the blog’s side column marked "About Science Links." The side column is on the desktop version. I apologize for any inconvenience and frustration when past links are outdated. If the sites still exist but with changed addresses, you should be able to find them with an Internet search.

National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) HOME.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/


Protein Site Guide NCBI 

Listsed under Databases:  BioProject Link (formerly Genome Project), large biological databases. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/proteins/


Telomere to Telomere Project (T2T): The first complete, gapless sequence of a human genome.

https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/telomere-to-telomere


Uniprot: Database of Proteins.

https://www.uniprot.org/


RCSB PDB (Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank).
https://www.rcsb.org/


Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Read the Bible

The late Pope Francis encouraged Catholics to read at least a few verses of the Bible every day (related Vatican News article HERE). This Pope even suggested you take a pocket Bible with you wherever you go. The entire New Testament can be found in this pint size. And both Testaments are as close as your smart phone since there are Bibles online as well, such as in the version offered by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops HERE: The New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE). Even though Bible passages are read at every mass, the repeating cycle of the liturgy doesn’t cover all of the book. It makes a difference to read the Bible in sequence, and even more so when there are study notes.

I just finished reading through the whole Bible, New and Old Testaments, for the second time. The first time was very long ago and I didn’t use study notes. There are different versions of the Bible, such as the King James (KJV) and New International (NIV). This time, using the NABRE, I read all the notes along with the Bible verses.

It is humbling to realize the extent of Biblical expertise that the writers of the study notes have. However, scholars can disagree, change their minds, and sometimes be wrong. Therefore the notes are not on the same level as the Bible itself, and if they disagree with the reader's faith understanding, they can be investigated further by means of the many books and commentaries that deeply explore aspects of the Bible. In general, though, the notes help the reader learn about the Lord, the persons described, the relationship between New and Old Testaments, etc. The study Bibles often have maps of the  background settings. It’s worthwhile to have these, although you can look up maps on the internet if you don’t have them in your particular Bible. 

The Bible is a long book, and with the study notes it seems twice as long. But it is incomparable in delving into the most intriguing aspects of reality – the truth and yet mystery of God and how He relates to us humans.

Image link HERE.

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Cardinal Consistory

Pope Leo XIV called an “Extraordinary Consistory” of Catholic Cardinals from all over the world for January 7-8 (link to the article with photo is HERE). This event was held for support and guidance for Leo for the direction of the Church. At first, there were four possible topics presented, summarized as Evangelization, Liturgy, Synodality, and the Roman Curia service to the local churches. Due to time constraints, these were reduced to two, as reported in the article:

By a “clear majority,” the roughly 170 cardinals gathered for the Extraordinary Consistory convened by Pope Leo XIV—the first of his pontificate—voted for “Synod and synodality” and “Evangelization and mission in the Church in the light of Evangelii gaudium” as the themes on which to reflect during these two days of work.

I was glad to see the focus starts with Evangelization and Synodality. Though the other topics are important, the method to gain cooperation between conflicting ideas and opinions comes before them. And Evangelization is of utmost importance to the Church. It’s encouraging to see Catholic Cardinals from around the world agreeing on these matters.


Another Vatican News webpage describes some thoughts shared by Pope Leo to the Cardinals during the Consistory Mass HERE.

Thursday, December 18, 2025

Christmas 2025

May you have a blessed Christmas, whether celebrating it for many years or for the first time. I'm praying for all persons to see the truth of Jesus Christ. 

I'd also like to see all Christians, including myself, make every effort to love others as Christ asks. Help us to do so, Lord. 

Monday, September 8, 2025

Implementation

I had been following the Bishops’ Synod on Synodality 2021-2024, previously led by Pope Francis. In the first phase, The Consultation of the People of God, all Catholics, laypersons and leadership, were invited, in short, to communally discuss and pray about their concerns relating to the Catholic Church. The second phase of the Catholic Church’s Synodal process was the Discernment of the Pastors, composed of sessions which included meetings in Rome, mostly with Bishops but with others invited. I am thankful Pope Francis was able to complete this phase of his undertaking and issue a note with the final document (link HERE) that declares it part of the papal magisterium (more HERE).

I admit I had been under the wrong impression about the nomenclature of the phases when I gave links to the Synod website in the past. It seemed to me that the discussions and reports of all Catholics, started in 2021, and the following meetings in Rome, finished in 2024, were both part of the first Synod phase. This division of meetings is further complicated by the fact that Bishops met in Continental groups in between. Please forgive me if the descriptions I gave caused confusion, but anyone going to the Synod website can sort out each of the phases. In any case, though the dates “2021-2024” attached to the Synod title imply that the Synod had a limited scope, Pope Francis desired that the process of synodality be an ongoing undertaking for all members of the Church. I imagine he would have liked to stick around for further stages, but apparently God had other plans.

Nevertheless, our new Holy Father, Pope Leo XIV, had been active in previous phases of synodality and is now presiding over the Synodal leadership, as shown in this post’s photo from an article in Vatican News HERE. This group is encouraging churches to follow through with the third phase of the Synod, known as the Implementation Phase, and has provided resources on the Synod site HERE.